Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed
От | Diogo Biazus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 406AF751.7060502@ikono.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran wrote: > Diogo Biazus wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I have a database using tsearch2 to index 300 000 documents. >> I've already have optimized the queries, and the database is vacuumed >> on a daily basis. >> The stat function tells me that my index has aprox. 460 000 unique >> words (I'm using stemmer and a nice stopword list). >> The problem is performance, some queries take more than 10 seconds to >> execute, and I'm not sure if my bottleneck is memory or io. >> The server is a Athlon XP 2000, HD ATA133, 1.5 GB RAM running >> postgresql 7.4.3 over freebsd 5.0 with lots of shared buffers and >> sort_mem... >> >> Does anyone has an idea of a more cost eficient solution? >> How to get a better performance without having to invest some >> astronomicaly high amount of money? > > > This isn't hardware related, but FreeBSD 5 is not a particularly > impressive > performer. Especially 5.0 ... 5.2.1 would be better, but if you're > shooting > for performance, 4.9 will probably outperform both of them at this > stage of > the game. > > Something to consider if the query tuning that others are helping with > doesn't > solve the problem. Follow through with that _first_ though. > > However, if you insist on running 5, make sure your kernel is compiled > without > WITNESS ... it speeds things up noticably. Thanks for the advice, I'll try recompiling the kernel. Does the freebsd version make a noticeable diference? Regards, -- Diogo Biazus diogo@ikono.com.br http://www.ikono.com.br
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: