Re: backup manifests
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: backup manifests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40673857-035b-1087-bb18-393873679465@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: backup manifests (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/04/09 23:10, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Fujii Masao (masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com) wrote: >> On 2020/04/09 2:35, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >>>> When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in >>>> the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic >>>> because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup. >>>> So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the >>>> cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached. >>>> >>>> Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached. >>> >>> Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my >>> part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change. >>> Thanks! >> >> Thanks for reviewing them! I pushed them. >> >> Please note that the commit messages have not been delivered to >> pgsql-committers yet. > > They've been released and your address whitelisted. Many thanks!! Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: