Re: partial VACUUM FULL
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partial VACUUM FULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4060C30D.3030106@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partial VACUUM FULL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: partial VACUUM FULL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: >>Another >>is that the setting of vacuum_mem (in postgresql.conf) limits the amount of >>cleanup that vacuum can do. > > This is completely untrue. Increasing vacuum_mem will likely make > things faster on large tables (by avoiding the need for multiple passes > over the indexes). It will not change the end result though. My mistake then. Was this true for some previous version? I could have swore I read somewhere that vacuum_mem had to be set high enough or vacuum wouldn't be able to clean everything up (aside from anything locked in transactions). Now that I'm looking, I can't find any such reference, so perhaps I misunderstood and twisted the meaning. Is performance the only reason for increasing vacuum_mem? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: