Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4053DB08.5000002@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote: > Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > >> the point is that PostgreSQL is no GNU product, never has been and if someone >> intends to he shall do so after yanking out the contributions I made. > > Note that when you released your contributions you did so under a license that > imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a Microsoft > Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they would be free to do so. > Likewise if someone wanted to release a GPL'd "GNU Postgresql" they could do > it. And nobody could force either to yank anyone's code. I released my contributions under the BSD license. A license change is only possible when accepted by the Copyright holder. I might have missed something, but when did Microsoft get the Copyright of my code? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: