Re: Online enabling of checksums
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 405348E1-81A7-4040-9207-7ADBB8A04D11@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online enabling of checksums (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online enabling of checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 26 Jul 2018, at 19:35, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On July 26, 2018 10:03:39 AM PDT, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com <mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Why can't we do better? > > I don't think it's that hard to do better. IIRC I even outlined something before the freeze. If not, o certainly can (sketch:use procsignal based acknowledgment protocol, using a 64 bit integer. Useful for plenty other things). Not really arguing for or against, but just to understand the reasoning before starting hacking. Why do we feel that a restart (intended for safety here) in this case is a burden on a use-once process? Is it from a usability or technical point of view? Just want to make sure we are on the same page before digging in to not hack on this patch in a direction which isn’t what is requested. cheers ./daniel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: