Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
От | Gavin M. Roy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4051001F.8060501@ehpg.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I think having a pgfoundry.postgresql.net/org is good, but it should have its own identity, pgfoundry.org for the main url gets my vote for what it's worth. Gavin Josh Berkus wrote: >Folks, > >As we discussed a couple weeks ago, Marc, Andrew, Tim Perdue, Chris Ryan and I >are testing implementing GForge in place of GBorg for associated projects for >PostgreSQL. > >One thing which was suggested initially was that this new project hosting site >be at www.postgresql.net with projects being <projectname>.postgresql.net. > >However, some of the "porting" team felt that it would be confusing for people >who typed in www.postgresql.net to be presented with the GForge interface, >and suggested that we use the domain after what we'll be calling the new >Tool, namely pgFoundry, thus putting stuff at www.pgFoundry.org and ><projectname>.pgfoundry.org. > >So far, only 4 people, total, have expressed opinons on the matter. I'm >throwing this on Hackers so that members of projects we will be hosting can >indicate whether they: > >A) Favor www.postgresql.net >B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org >C) Don't care as long as the porting is relatively painless. > >Thanks for your time! > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: