Re: Update on 'portal' changes

Hi!

Robert Treat wrote:
>>>I guess we're still trying to decide if he can save us valuable time :-)
>>
>>Ahem. I'd learn that my work is not needed *now* rather than later, when
>>  I've spent more time on it...
>
> No, the work is needed now, and quite frankly I have more faith that
> you'll get it done than I do that we will, at least anytime soon. It's
> just that we keep going round and round on the whole "working together"
> thing...

Seems like you are bent on teaching me about how Open Source works once again...

I already learned that this "working together" thing requires *mutual* desire
to, uhm, work together. If such a desire is not found on one side, then this
side can come up with really inventive excuses.

Consider: Marc had some disagreements with me, too. But I already have a
development server set up at postgresql.org domain.

On the other hand *you* write "I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to giving you
(Alexy) cvs commit privileges except that you have a tendency to fly off the
handle that makes me a little bit nervous..."

Are you *this* afraid of me defacing postgresql.org?.. ;]

> a similar issue came up on interfaces, with libtcl. A new guy
> had a bunch of patches he wanted to submit but the project maintainers
> had been idle for awhile, so he wanted to take over the project. The
> admins stated they wanted to stay on, so he forked the project... all
> bad imho. ISTM that when your new to a project, you should assume that
> you don't know as much as folks that are currently running things.

Oh, yeah. Reading the current traffic I got the impression that the folks who
are running things know as little as myself. What's up with techdocs? What is
this PGFoundry thing? Why is search broken? ;]