Re: Question on Opteron performance
От | Nick Barr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on Opteron performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 404D95FC.8020000@chuckie.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question on Opteron performance (Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question on Opteron performance
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Stephen Robert Norris wrote: >On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:50, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > >>Stephen Robert Norris wrote: >> >> >> >>>Is this true? Did they really double the size of the memory bus, or is >>>it a case of 4 CPUs fighting for the same memory bandwidth that 2 had >>>before? >>> >>> >>> >>Opertons have built in memory controllers so they scale better than >>intel chips. See http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1982 >> >> > >I didn't realise that. Thanks for the pointer. We're going to be buying >some more servers soon, I should look at Opterons I guess... > > Stephen > > And here is a nice pretty picture of the architecture of a 4 way Opteron. http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AM190_briefv3.pdf I know which architecture I prefer, the one without a central hub. Whether the Opteron will perform well for PG I have no idea but we also are planning some 4 way Opteron boxes to beef up our data center. We will probably do some benchmarking on those bad boys when we get them and post it to pgsql-performance if anyone is interested. Nick
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: