Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
От | David Garamond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 404960EB.1070404@zara.6.isreserved.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Steve Crawford wrote: >>>Please, don't call it 7.3.6. Streamlining releases is terrible. >>>7.3.7 or 7.3.6.1 or SOMETHING other than 7.3.6, and just let >>>7.3.6 be a brown paper bag release (like 6.4.1 was). >> >>There were no code-change differences in this rewrap, so I see no >>real need to change the version number. > > I have to agree with Lamar et. al. The _code_ may not have changed but > the "product" did and the version number should reflect that. I second this. As someone has said, we should probably use the -rc mechanism in the future (changing the versioning from 7.3.6 into 7.3.6.1 has a greater chance of breaking things). Allow at least one week before the final -rc turns into final. The last -rc will be byte-to-byte identical with the final, we just rename it. *If* the final turns out to contain some stupid mistake, we'll just have to make 7.3.7... Once something is released, it should not change at all. -- dave
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: