Re: [HACKERS] Re: check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40492.1488662211@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 03/03/2017 02:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> I have been setting up a buildfarm member with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE >>> -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY, settings which Alvaro suggested to me.I got core >>> dumps with these stack traces. The platform is Amazon Linux. >> I have replicated this on a couple of other platforms (Fedora, FreeBSD) >> and back to 9.5. The same failure doesn't happen with buildfarm runs on >> earlier branches, although possibly they don't have the same set of tests. > well, the problem in rebuild_relation() seems pretty blatant: I fixed that, and the basic regression tests no longer crash outright with these settings, but I do see half a dozen errors that all seem to be in RLS-related tests. They all look like something is trying to access an already-closed relcache entry, much like the problem in rebuild_relation(). But I have no time to look closer for the next several days. Stephen, I think this is your turf anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: