Re: Fixed width rows faster?
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fixed width rows faster? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 404889A6.7@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fixed width rows faster? (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fixed width rows faster?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff wrote: > I'm guessing the answer to this is "no" > > Is there any performance advantage to using a fixed width row (with PG)? No. The user docs state that the performance is equal for char, varchar and text. > I've heard this theory a few times and I think it is based on older, > different databases MySQL used to have this issue (I don't know if it still does or not) to the point that the docs once claimed that an index on a varchar was barely as fast as a char with no index at all. > and we have also some custom software here that uses > fixed width rows to be able to hit row N in O(1), but that isn't what > I'd call a real database. Isn't needed in modern versions of Postgres, but I don't know (historically) if it ever was or not. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: