Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly.
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403B4EE1.3040607@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly.
Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly. |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: >Richard Neill <rn214@hermes.cam.ac.uk> writes: > > >>This ordering is perverse! >> >> > >No kidding. > > > >>No matter what the priority is of the >>different characters, I cannot understand how the above can arise. >> >> > >You are assuming that it's a byte-at-a-time process. It's not. I >believe the first pass considers only letters and digits. > >You can easily prove to yourself that it's not just Postgres. Here's >an example on my Linux laptop: > >[tgl@g3 tgl]$ cat zzz >Cymbal #1 >Cymbal - 18 inch >Cymbal #2 >[tgl@g3 tgl]$ LC_ALL=C sort zzz >Cymbal #1 >Cymbal #2 >Cymbal - 18 inch >[tgl@g3 tgl]$ LC_ALL=en_GB sort zzz >Cymbal #1 >Cymbal - 18 inch >Cymbal #2 >[tgl@g3 tgl]$ > > I verified this, and it's not GB specific as one might suggest... Same with en_US, de_DE, fr_FR, af_ZA. Does this behaviour really make sense to anybody? Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: