Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4037.1400771271@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta
build ready)
Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So, having seen that proof-of-concept, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make >> an effort to support contrib/uuid-ossp with a choice of UUID libraries >> underneath it. There is a non-OSSP set of UUID library functions >> available on Linux ("libuuid" from util-linux-ng). I don't know whether >> that's at all compatible with the BSD functions, but even if it's not, >> presumably a shim for it wouldn't be much larger than the BSD patch. > Well, if you want to do the work, I'm fine with that. But if you want > to just shoot uuid-ossp in the head, I'm fine with that, too. As > Peter says, perfectly reasonable alternatives are available. Well, *I* don't want to do that work. I was hoping to find a volunteer, but the silence has been notable. I think deprecation is the next step. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: