Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4034.1292613755@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 17.12.2010 21:07, Tom Lane wrote: >> IIUC, the problem is that the bufmgr might think that a GIST NSN is an >> LSN that should affect when to force out a dirty buffer? What if we >> taught it the difference? We could for example dedicate a pd_flags >> bit to marking pages whose pd_lsn isn't actually an LSN. > I'm not very fond of expanding buffer manager's knowledge of the page > layout. How about a new flag in the buffer desc, BM_UNLOGGED? That could work too, if you can explain how the flag comes to be set without a bunch of ugliness all over the system. I don't want callers of ReadBuffer to have to supply the bit for example. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: