Re: High Planning Time
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: High Planning Time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403.1453473301@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: High Planning Time (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes: > Phil S wrote: >> explain analyze >> select * from message >> limit 1 >> >> "Limit (cost=0.00..0.44 rows=1 width=1517) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=1 loops=1)" >> " -> Seq Scan on message (cost=0.00..28205.48 rows=64448 width=1517) (actual time=0.007..0.007 >> rows=1 loops=1)" >> "Planning time: 3667.361 ms" >> "Execution time: 1.652 ms" >> >> As you can see the query is simple and does not justify 3 seconds of planning time. It would appear >> that there is an issue with my configuration but I am not able to find anything that looks out of >> sorts in the query planning configuration variables. Any advice about what I should be looking for to >> fix this would be appreciated. > This is odd. > Could you profile the backend during such a statement to see where the time is spent? I'm wondering about locks. Perhaps turning on log_lock_waits would yield useful info. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: