Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 402D9C6C.2070601@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
|
Список | pgsql-general |
No disagreement from me about the 64-bit *hardware* and *os*... Now suppose you want to run a Pg database for such a situation.... may as well compile 32-bit. Why ? well you *dont* want to set shared_buffers to 20G... in fact 200M works better - why ? well your 64-bit os file cache is much more efficient at using your 24G or RAM than Pg's buffer cache logic is (at the moment anyway). regards Mark Dann Corbit wrote: > >Where 64 bits matters (in general -- not restricted to PG database >systems): > >Size of the database is huge (e.g. every toll paid in New Jersey in the >last 5 years) >Available memory is huge (e.g. you buy a machine with 24 gigs of ram) >Data bus bandwidth is huge (e.g. You buy an 8-way Opteron with 40 GB/sec >bandwidth) > >The 32 bit machines cannot compete in these arenas. > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: