Re: official debian packaging issue
От | Raphaël Enrici |
---|---|
Тема | Re: official debian packaging issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 402941E9.6030609@club-internet.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | official debian packaging issue (Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz@club-internet.fr>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Another thing: is it still right to use the description found in the README file on postgresql mirrors as a short description of the product for the package ? Here it is: "Description: pgAdmin III - PostgreSQL Tools pgAdmin III is a database design and management application for use with PostgreSQL. It is written in C++ using the wxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org) cross-platform framework to allow it to run on multiple platforms. Please visit http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/ for more details." Regards, Raphaël Raphaël Enrici wrote: > Hi friends, > > I'm actually working on the official debian package and I need some > precision concerning the development process so that I can make > choices on how I 'm gonna package... > > Here is a question I ask to myself and on which I'm not clear: > Consider the case where we or someone find a bug in pgAdmin3 that > would involve a new wxWin snapshot. As usual this would be corrected > in the snapshot and would give the birth to a new wx snapshot and to > the update of our snaphots packages. But what about the "stable" > branch ? I mean that if someone find a bug in actual 1.0.2 that can > only be corrected by using a new wxWin snap, what will be the > decisions : can this become a future 1.0.3 ? or will we switch to a > next major release ? > > Regards, > Raphaël > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: