Re: Contents of pg_listener linger?
От | Jeff Boes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4023BE4F.4030007@nexcerpt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Contents of pg_listener linger? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote: >Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes: > > >>What causes the contents of pg_listener to "linger" long past the lifespan of >>the associated database backend? My table has rows that I know must be days old. >> >> > >PG version? > > > 7.3.4 >In any case, if there is a row for a dead backend it should be removed >the first time someone tries to "notify" that condition name and >discovers that he can't signal the dead backend. If you've got days-old >dead rows they must be for very-infrequently-notified conditions. > > regards, tom lane > > Yup, that seems to be the case. When I "NOTIFY" these, they disappear. Any other way to clean them up? The problem is that there's one legit listener, and umpteen dead ones. I can rig up something to notify all these but I have to make sure that the legit listener is offline. -- Jeff Boes vox 269.226.9550 ext 24 Database Engineer fax 269.349.9076 Nexcerpt, Inc. http://www.nexcerpt.com ...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: