Re: Before ship 7.4.2
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Before ship 7.4.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 401FF461.4060003@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Before ship 7.4.2 (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lamar Owen wrote: | On Monday 02 February 2004 10:54 pm, Tom Lane wrote: | |>Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes: |> |>>Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with |>>7.4.1 is the wrong version? | | |>There is no pgdb.py in the core PG 7.4.* releases. I suppose you |>are talking about a packaging error in the RPM distribution. Lamar Owen |>would be the man to talk to about that ... Lamar, any thoughts about |>this? | | | Well, my first instinct is to throw out the python client RPM entirely. Then | package the python client in a separate RPM. My original plan was not to | ship a python subpackage at all, but then I had a spec file change | contributed that kept the python client in. So I went that direction; | principle of least surprise and all. But I am not at all attached to keeping | it; likewise, the JDBC stuff could easily be moved to a completely separate | RPM instead of a subpackage. Is it not too late drop the python client RPM for the version 7.4 ? Anyway the version pgdb.py in rpm with the version 7.3.2 is the good one, I don't know where you get the wrong pgdb.py pre 7.3.2, isn't this file in any CVS ? Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAH/Rh7UpzwH2SGd4RAkD9AKCg8dwii1r0xKXZxa8H3UZ2oVPY/QCfThtO yFyk9wzD3uVFzkRF7GJiDJU= =HQnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: