Re: Sometimes referential integrity seems not to work
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sometimes referential integrity seems not to work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 401E80D2.9080909@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sometimes referential integrity seems not to work (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sometimes referential integrity seems not to work
Re: Sometimes referential integrity seems not to work |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> writes: >> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Enio Schutt Junior wrote: >> >> In a database I am working, I sometimes have to delete all the records in >> >> some tables. According to the referential integrity defined in the creation >> >> of the tables, postmaster should not delete the records, but it does. I have >> >> used the following commands: "delete from table_1" and "truncate table_1". >> >> ... >> >> can the postgres user delete records despite referential integrity? >> >> I think the first PG release or two that had TRUNCATE TABLE would allow >> you to apply it despite the existence of foreign-key constraints on the >> table. Recent releases won't though. > > Yeah, truncate didn't worry me much, but the implication that delete from > table_1; worked did. TRUNCATE cannot be used inside of a transaction, and since 7.3 it checks for foreign keys. So I guess Enio is getting but ignoring the error message when trying the delete, but then the truncate does the job in his pre-7.3 database. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: