Re: pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 401708B2.7080201@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > With the new preload option is there any benefit/drawback to using > pl/Python versus pl/pgSQL? If you're asking about relative speed, I did some *very* simple tests and posted them here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-07/msg00239.php without preload: ===================================================================== regression=# explain analyze select echo_plperl('hello'); Total runtime: 55.29 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_pltcl('hello'); Total runtime: 23.34 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_plpythonu('hello'); Total runtime: 32.40 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_plpgsql('hello'); Total runtime: 3.09 msec with preload: ===================================================================== regression=# explain analyze select echo_plperl('hello'); Total runtime: 5.14 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_pltcl('hello'); Total runtime: 7.64 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_plpythonu('hello'); Total runtime: 1.91 msec regression=# explain analyze select echo_plpgsql('hello'); Total runtime: 1.35 msec This was intended to just measure the time to execute a simple "hello world" type of function, for the first time in a given session. I did not repeat/average the results though, so you might want to do some of your own testing. Joe
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: