Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> I think Tom's point was that it's wrong to add a separate entry-tree CPU
> cost estimation to another estimation, which tries (very inadequately) to
> estimate the whole scan cost. Instead, I propose writing better estimations
> for both entry-tree CPU cost and data-trees CPU cost and replacing existing
> CPU estimation altogether.
Great idea, if someone is willing to do it ...
regards, tom lane