Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4010.1091319264@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Version Numbering -- The great debate (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Even if Savepoints don't make it, we'll still have: Savepoints are in, as is exception-trapping in functions (at least plpgsql, the other PLs are on their own :-(). Some other major improvements you didn't mention: Cross-datatype comparisons are indexable (at least for common combinations); this solves a huge performance gotcha Dependency-aware pg_dump Much more complete support for rowtype operations > This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release > before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been > implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more > momentous. If this isn't 8.0, then what will be? I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: