Re: New PostgreSQL search resource
От | Jussi Mikkola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 400C3127.8090107@bonware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New PostgreSQL search resource
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I think most of the people use http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi Default settings, search for select distinct returns in about 10 minutes, with "You haven't typed any word(s) to search for." Same query with match full phrase... (I did not wait long enough. But several minutes in any case. Don't know about the result.) Same query with match full phrase and 7.4 documentation. 2 results in 5 seconds. Results are select into and pg_select. Could we do something to this search? (Change the defaults, divide it to smaller parts, use different search engine...) Rgs, Jussi Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Not really. with htdig, I can do "select distinct" on the 7.3 docs >> and I get exactly 7 responses back, and they all have select followed >> immediately by distinct, with only space, CR / LF etc in between. >> >> >> > Well, if you search for select distinct... OpenFTS automatically searches > for select & distinct. My search returned: > > 5 results with the first one being this: > > http://www.commandprompt.com/community//search.lxp?lxpwrap=734/queries-select-lists.html > > > Which seems fairly accurate ;). Perhaps a better description of what > the problem actually is or > the behavior you are expecting? > > SIncerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > >> And the & symbol josh recommended shows as being ignored, so that >> didn't work either. >> >> Word combos like "bulk loads" or "run-time configuration" are quite >> handy filters. >> >> > >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: