Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow?
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 400A28D8.3070104@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow? (Eric Ridge <ebr@tcdi.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> Theory B would be that there's some huge overhead in calling non-built-in >> functions on your platform. We do know that looking up a "C" function is >> significantly more expensive than looking up a "builtin" function, but >> there should only be half a dozen such calls involved in this test case; >> it's hard to credit that that takes 200 msec. Does the time drop at all >> on second and subsequent repetitions in a single backend run? > > > Yes, it drops from about .680ms to the .250ish that I posted. > > I suppose I should try compiling this little stub into postgres, eh? What if you try the new preload_libraries (or whatever it's called) config variable in postgresql.conf in the 7.4 release? Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: