Re: failures on machines using jfs
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: failures on machines using jfs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4003EB9C.30406@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: failures on machines using jfs (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hannu Krosing wrote: > Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03: > >>Hannu Krosing wrote: >> >>>Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: >>> >>> >>>>It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch >>>>volume (JFS mounted with noatime). >>> >>> >>>Which files/directories do you keep on "scratch" volume ? >>> >>>All postgres files or just some (WAL, tmp) ? >> >>No Postgres files are kept in scratch only the files being loaded >>into the database via COPY or lo_import. > > > then the speedup does not make any sense ! > > Is reading from jfs filesystem also 5 times faster than reading from > ext3 ? > > The only explanation I can give to filling database from jfs volume to > be so much faster could be some strange filesystem cache interactions. http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/postgresql.php -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: