Re: Continuous inserts...

Hi!

At 14:16 22.08.00 -0400, you wrote:
>Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> >     I haven't looked at the code, but pg_class only has a boolean
> >     telling if a class has rules or not. Could it be that  adding
> >     more  rules  (or  dropping just a few instead of all) doesn't
> >     update the pg_class tuple, thus the syscache  for  the  table
> >     isn't  invalidated and other backends continue to use the old
> >     information instead of rescanning pg_rewrite?
>
>This is done correctly in current sources --- see
>setRelhasrulesInRelation().  However I recall having dorked with that
>code not long ago, and I forget what it looked like before.  Perhaps
>7.0.* is broken in this respect?  Would think people would have noticed,
>though.
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Perhaps I should have mentioned that the test was done using 6.5.3 - I didn't
come around to upgrade yet...

Oh, yes, the mentioned rule was the ONLY rule on that database.

Greetings,        Joerg
--
+------****  Science & Engineering Applications GmbH  ****------+
|                                                               |
| Joerg Hessdoerfer                                             |
| Leading SW developer Phone:    +49 (0)2203-962211             |
| S.E.A GmbH           Fax:                 -962212             |
| D-51147 Koeln        Internet: joerg.hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com |
|                                http://www.sea-gmbh.com        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+