Re: Rule recompilation
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rule recompilation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4.2.0.58.20010712224356.0131d370@pop.freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rule recompilation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
IMHO we are trying to have a compiled language behave like an interpreted language. This is a bottom to top approach with no real future. Here is a proposal of a top to bottom approach. What we do in pgAdmin is that we store objects (functions, views and triggers) in separate tables called Development tables. The production objects (which you are talking about) are running safe *without* modification. At any moment, it is possible to recompile the development objects (functions, triggers and views modified by the user) from development tables. pgAdmin then checks dependencies a goes through a whole compilation process. BUT ONLY AT USER REQUEST. Who would honestly work on a production server? This is too dangerous in a professional environment. In a near future, we will offer the ability to store PostgreSQL objects on separate servers (called code repository). You will then be able to move objects from the development server to the production servers. Think of replication. Also, pgAdmin will include advanced team work features and code serialization. pgAdmin is already an *old* product as we are working on exciting new things: http://www.greatbridge.org/project/pgadmin/cvs/cvs.php/pgadmin/help/todo.html Before downloading pgAdmin from CVS, read this: http://www.greatbridge.org/project/pgadmin/cvs/cvs.php/binaries/readme.html We are looking for feedback and help from the community. Greetings from Jean-Michel POURE, Paris, France
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: