Access and Postgres question.
От | Tim Uckun |
---|---|
Тема | Access and Postgres question. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4.2.0.58.20000728204043.00c24d20@mail.diligence.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
I am testing postgres 7.02 and ms-sql server as back ends to ms access. I created identical databases containing three tables with about 1.2 , 1.6 and 3 million records each. The machine that is running SQL server is a dual pIII zeon machine with raid 0 and 512 megs of ram. The postgres machine is a dual pIII 500 with 256 megs of ram no raid but nice fast scsi drive running red hat. Given this scenario I do expect postgres to be slower then ms sql server. What I find very odd is that in some tasks it actually faster (very slightly) like when doing simple select * from table where primarykey=x. But when I do select * from very_big_table (I know it's not such a good idea) it is insanely slow. On one test the table with 1.2 million records too 12 seconds in postgres and less then a second in sql server!. I suspect that this has something to do with the ODBC driver because I am having a hard time believing that postgres is that slow. I suspect that the MS-SQL server ODBC driver is not actually pulling up ALL the records but just a few at a time (and perhaps spinning off another thread to fetch the rest). Can anybody confirm this? ---------------------------------------------- Tim Uckun Mobile Intelligence Unit. ---------------------------------------------- "There are some who call me TIM?" ----------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: