Re: [GENERAL] System requirements
| От | Charles Tassell |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] System requirements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4.2.0.58.20000124220121.00b38360@mailer.isn.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | System requirements ("J. Roeleveld" <j.roeleveld@softhome.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
The disks you use also play a big part in the performance you get. If you are going to have multiple simultaneous connections accessed the server, I'd go with a good SCSI disk array. Maybe even RAID if it's going to be under a high load. At 07:49 PM 1/24/00, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >This depends entirely(?) on what kinds of tables you use, especially their >size, and what kind of queries you want to do with it. 128MB RAM should be >fine for average applications, the hard disk size pretty much just limits >how much data you can store (and sort), and the processor factor is hard >to gauge. Having two processors might help more than anything else. But in >general it's for you to find out. > > >On 2000-01-24, J. Roeleveld mentioned: > > > Hi, > > > > I've been checking the archives and documentation for what the > > system requirements are for a PostgreSQL database.... > > > > It's to be used for a database with 8 users, and has MS-Access front-end > > which causes app. 2 connections per user. > > > > My idea was: > > > > 128Meg Ram > > 20 Gig HD > > 500 Mhz. Celeron > > > > will this be sufficient, or will it have be something else? > > > > Also what is required more, memory or CPU-power? > > > > hoping for an answer, > > > > Joost Roeleveld > > > > > > ************ > > > > > >-- >Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 >peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala >http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden > > > >************
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: