Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb1002241807q11c93f00oe92e808e14c0124a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The one thing I'm undecided about is whether we want the immediate > NOTICE, as opposed to dialing down the time till the first WARNING > to something like 5 or 10 seconds. I think the main argument for the > latter approach would be to avoid log-spam in normal operation. > Although Greg is correct that a NOTICE wouldn't be logged at default > log levels, lots of people don't use that default. Comments? I don't want that immediate NOTICE message, which sounds like a noise. Delaying it or changing the log level to DEBUG work for me. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: