Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb1002180239g2443e3b3qd8657c2662415c42@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> O_DIRECT helps us when we're not going to read the file again, because >> we don't waste cache on it. If we are, which is the case here, it >> should be really bad for performance, since we actually have to do a >> physical read. >> >> Incidentally, that should also apply to general WAL when archive_mdoe >> is on. Do we optimize for that? > > Hmm, no we don't. We do take that into account so that we refrain from > issuing posix_fadvice(DONTNEED) if archive_mode is on, but we don't > disable O_DIRECT. Maybe we should.. Since the performance of WAL write is more important than that of WAL archiving in general, that optimization might offer little benefit. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: