Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb1002111852t106baee9x8913ba52c6c65f9c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > Why hasn't libpq had keepalives for years? I guess that it's because keepalive doesn't work as expected in some cases. For example, if the network outage happens before a client sends some packets, keepalive doesn't work, then it would have to wait for a long time until it detects the outage. This is the specification of linux kernel. So a client should not have excessive expectations of keepalive, and should have another timeout like QueryTimeout of JDBC. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: