walreceiver settings Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> This approach is OK if the stand-alone walreceiver is treated steadily
> by the startup process like a child process under postmaster:
>
> * Handling of some interrupts: SIGHUP, SIGTERM?, SIGINT, SIGQUIT...
>   For example, the startup process would need to rethrow walreceiver
>   the interrupt from postmaster.
>
> * Communication with other child processes: stats collector? syslogger?...
>   For example, the log message generated by walreceiver should also
>   be collected by syslogger if requested.

Also we should consider how to give a GUC parameter to the stand-alone
walreceiver. In the initial patch, since walreceiver was a child process of
postmaster, it could easily get any GUC parameter. But it's not so easy
to give a GUC parameter to a stand-alone program.

I think that at least the following parameters should affect walreceiver:

* wal_sync_method I want walreceiver to use fdatasync instead of fsync for performance improvement. And other DBA might
wantto choose another method. 

* fsync I'm not surprised if someone wants to disable fsync in the standby.

* some parameters for logging I think that the log messages generated by walreceiver should also be treated as well as
theother postgres messages. For example, I'd like to specify log_line_prefix also for walreceiver. 

There are some approaches to give a GUC parameter to walreceiver.
Which is the best?

1) Give a parameter as a command-line argument of the stand-alone   walreceiver. This is a straightforward approach,
butwouldn't cover   a reload of parameter. 

2) Give a parameter via pipe between the startup process and walreceiver.

3) Change walreceiver to read a configuration file. The problem is that   the command-line argument of postmaster
doesn'taffect walreceiver.   The combination of 1) and 3) might be required. 

4) Change walreceiver back to a child process of postmaster.

Do you have any other better approach?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center