Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0906011739i28361675q4e88c0648feb34e3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> pg_standby can use ln command to restore an archived file, >> which might destroy the archived file as follows. > > Does it matter? pg_standby's source area wouldn't normally be an > "archive" in the real sense of the word, it's just a temporary staging > area between master and slave. If so, it might be deleted after triggering the warm-standby. But, we cannot remove it because the latest xlog file which is required for normal recovery might exist in it. This is another undesirable scenario. Is this problem? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: