Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0902261132i7c62c6dbw211fe6964139c69e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think the real problem here is that pg_standby traps SIGQUIT. The startup > process doesn't receive the SIGQUIT because it's in system(), and pg_standby > doesn't propagate it to the startup process either because it traps it. Yes, you are right. > I think we should simply remove the signal handler for SIGQUIT from > pg_standby. +1 > I don't see how that helps, as we already have this in there: > > signaled = WIFSIGNALED(rc) || WEXITSTATUS(rc) > 125; > > ereport(signaled ? FATAL : DEBUG2, > (errmsg("could not restore file \"%s\" from archive: return code %d", > xlogfname, rc))); > > which means we already ereport(FATAL) if the restore command dies with SIGQUIT. SIGQUIT should kill the process immediately, so I think that the startup process as well as other auxiliary process should call exit(2) instead of ereport(FATAL). Right? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: