Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0812240258y3d208111i98758c8bb8ee1f34@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Yes, OK. So I think it would only work when full_page_writes = on, and > has been on since last checkpoint. So two changes: > > * We just need a boolean that starts at true every checkpoint and gets > set to false anytime someone resets full_page_writes or archive_command. > If the flag is set && full_page_writes = on then we skip the checkpoint > entirely and use the value from the last checkpoint. Sounds good. pg_start_backup on the standby (probably you are planning?) also needs this logic? If so, resetting full_page_writes or archive_command should generate its xlog. I have another thought: should we forbid the reset of archive_command during online backup? Currently we can do. If we don't need to do so, we also don't need to track the reset of archiving for fast pg_start_backup. > > * My "infra" patch also had a modified version of pg_start_backup() that > allowed you to specify IMMEDIATE checkpoint or not. Reworking that seems > a waste of time, and I want to listen to everybody else now and change > pg_start_backup() so it throws an IMMEDIATE CHECKPOINT and leave it > there. > > Can you work on those also? Umm.. I'm busy. Of course, I will try it if no one raises his or her hand. But, I'd like to put coding the core of synch rep ahead of this. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: