Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0812040057tb339dafh2b1c7d97d57e788f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Do we need to worry about periodic >>> > renegotiation of keys in be-secure.c? >>> >>> What is "keys" you mean? >> >> See the notes in that file for explanation. > > Thanks! I would check it. The key is used only when we use SSL for the connection of replication. As far as I examined, secure_write() renegotiates the key if needed. Since walsender calls secure_write() when sending the WAL to the standby, the key is renegotiated periodically. So, I think that we don't need to worry about the obsolescence of the key. Am I missing something? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: