Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0809100701q27f13090t63f073a6ecb63e99@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: >> >> Signals and locking, borrewed from Postgres-R, are now studied >> for the purpose in the log shipping, > > Cool. Let me know if you have any questions WRT this imessages stuff. If you're sure it's all right, I have a trivial question. Which signal should we use for the notification to the backend from WAL sender? The notable signals are already used. Or, since a backend don't need to wait on select() unlike WAL sender, ISTM that it's not so inconvenient to use a semaphore for that notification. Your thought? regards -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: