RE: How Many Partitions are Good Performing
От | Kumar, Virendra |
---|---|
Тема | RE: How Many Partitions are Good Performing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3e8c1f9df69e4b3492e531cf14b41aa6@USFKL11XG20CN01.mercer.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>) |
Ответы |
RE: How Many Partitions are Good Performing
|
Список | pgsql-general |
For test I created two tables with 7800 partitions each and joining them sees performance bottleneck. It is taking 5 secondsplanning time. Please see attached plan. Regards, Virendra -----Original Message----- From: pinker [mailto:pinker@onet.eu] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 12:07 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing I've run once a test on my laptop because was curious as well. From my results (on laptop - 16GB RAM, 4 cores) the upperlimit was 12k. Above it planning time was unbearable high - much higher than execution time. It's been tested on 9.5 -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html ________________________________ This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: