Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3d250597-384e-c5f4-7533-b513e366888f@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/25/17 12:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> It seems to me that VACUUM and ANALYZE somewhat disagree on what >> exactly reltuples means. VACUUM seems to be thinking that reltuples >> = live + dead while ANALYZE apparently believes that reltuples = >> live > >> The question is - which of the reltuples definitions is the right >> one? I've always assumed that "reltuples = live + dead" but perhaps >> not? > > I think the planner basically assumes that reltuples is the live > tuple count, so maybe we'd better change VACUUM to get in step. > Attached is a patch that (I think) does just that. The disagreement was caused by VACUUM treating recently dead tuples as live, while ANALYZE treats both of those as dead. At first I was worried that this will negatively affect plans in the long-running transaction, as it will get underestimates (due to reltuples not including rows it can see). But that's a problem we already have anyway, you just need to run ANALYZE in the other session. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: