Re: Index Skip Scan
От | Alexander Kuzmenkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index Skip Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3cfd317e-2a8b-8681-0833-8f2ead3af4d4@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index Skip Scan (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index Skip Scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
El 13/09/18 a las 18:39, Jesper Pedersen escribió: > > Yes, this doesn't look good. Using your test case I'm seeing that > unique is being chosen when the group size is below 34, and skip > above. This is with the standard initdb configuration; did you change > something else ? Or did you force the default plan ? Sorry I didn't mention this, the first column is indeed forced skip scan, just to see how it compares to index scan. > This is something to look at -- maybe there is a way to use > btpo_next/btpo_prev instead/too in order to speed things up. Atm we > just have the scan key in BTScanOpaqueData. I'll take a look after my > upcoming vacation; feel free to contribute those changes in the > meantime of course. > I probably won't be able to contribute the changes, but I'll try to review them. -- Alexander Kuzmenkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: