Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3c1cf991-8846-9a6f-c669-e21f8ea9a6a4@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/16/2018 08:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > I doubt as well that we'd be able to catch all the holes as well as the > conditions where the optimization could be run safely are rather > basically impossible to catch beforehand. I'd like to vote for getting > rid of this optimization for COPY, this can hurt more than it is > helpful. Per the lack of complaints, this could happen only in HEAD? Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we haven't had complaints. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: