Re: How to use result column names in having cause
От | chris smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to use result column names in having cause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3c1395330603310530o617a67bfqdcee459586b301f5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to use result column names in having cause ("Andrus" <eetasoft@online.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to use result column names in having cause
Re: How to use result column names in having cause |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/31/06, Andrus <eetasoft@online.ee> wrote: > >> In real application I have long expression instead of 123 and do'nt want > >> repeat this expression in HAVING clause. > > > > You have to repeat the expression. "AS" changes the output name, it > > can't be used either in the where clause or any other limiting factor > > like 'having': > > Doc about HAVING condition says: > > Each column referenced in condition must unambiguously reference a grouping > colum > > HAVING x> AVG(bar) unambiguously references to a grouping column x > > Is this bug ? It is very tedious to repeat same column expression in a > multiple times: one time in column expression, and n times in having clause. But you're not referencing x, you're trying to use AVG(bar) in your expression. I assume it's this way because the standard says so.. one of the more knowledgable list members will be able to confirm/deny this. -- Postgresql & php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: