Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers

On 6/22/22 06:31, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> FWIW, I just created a new thread to expose the port->authn_id through 
> the SYSTEM_USER sql reserved word.

Review for both seems to have dried up a bit. I'm not particularly
invested in my code, but I do want to see *a* solution go in. So if it
helps the review momentum for me to withdraw this patch and put my
effort into SYSTEM_USER, I can do that no problem.

Thoughts from prior reviewers? Is SYSTEM_USER the way to go?

--Jacob