Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3ae07868-1678-e849-9518-e8e518c5e467@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-02-28 Tu 11:40, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:55 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:On 2023-02-27 Mo 17:20, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
Hmm, yeah. I'm not sure I understand the point of this test anyway:
SELECT to_char(date '2010-03-01', 'DD TMMON YYYY' COLLATE "de_DE");
Uhm, they probably don't make much sense except for "tr_TR", so I'm fine with removing them. PFA a patch for so.
I think you missed my point, which was that the COLLATE clause above seemed particularly pointless. But I agree that all these are not much use, so I'll remove them as you suggest.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: