On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 11:10 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:54:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I don't know whether raising the default would be enough to fix that
> > in a nice way, and I certainly don't pretend to have a specific value
> > to offer. But it's undeniable that we have a serious problem here,
> > to the point where JIT is a net negative for quite a few people.
>
> Some further data: to my knowledge, most major managed postgres
> providers disable jit for their users.
I have also started recommending jit=off for all but analytic workloads.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe