Re: Mailing list archive advanced search sort-by applies filters to results
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mailing list archive advanced search sort-by applies filters to results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3a6ecb10-f243-46a4-b63f-192f9d485eb0@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mailing list archive advanced search sort-by applies filters to results (Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 4/18/24 14:23, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:57 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com > <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote: > > What is the email you are looking for? > > > The most recent one. > > > Sorting by "Rank" gives three messages. > > Sorting by "Date" gives four messages. > > Sorting by "Reverse Date" gives one message. > > > > I get: > 3 > 2 > 2 > > > Trying it again I get the same 3, 2, 2. The set of results is different too. > > Here are the titles for the search results (note how they're all different): > > # Rank > 1. JDBC FDW 0.3.1 release [1.20] > 2. PostgreSQL JDBC 42.7.0 Released [1.00] > 3. PostgreSQL JDBC 42.7.1 Released [1.00] > > # Date > 1. PostgreSQL JDBC 42.7.3, 42.6.2, 42.5.6, 42.4.5, 42.3.10, 42.2.29 > Released [1.10] > 2. JDBC FDW 0.4.0 release [1.10] > > # Reverse Date > 1. WiltonDB 3.3 released [0.10] > 2. PostgreSQL JDBC 42.7.2, 42.6.1, 42.5.5, 42.4.4, 42.3.9, 42.2.28, and > 42.2.28.jre7 Security update for CVE-2024-1597 [1.10] > > In any event, something is weird / wrong if the number or total set of > results changes based on sort order. > > Is the "Rank" data coming from somewhere else entirely that's not in > sync with the rest of the messages? (e.g., a separate elastic search > server?) This above my pay grade, someone with more knowledge of the internals will need to comment. > > Regards, > -- Sehrope Sarkuni > Founder & CEO | JackDB, Inc. | https://www.jackdb.com/ > <https://www.jackdb.com/> > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: