Re: UDT arrays
| От | Lukas Eder |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UDT arrays |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3a2e9872-dfd2-48ea-94d8-6cc72b3d5a28@x13g2000vbe.googlegroups.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | UDT arrays (Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Feb 8, 12:26 am, Lukas Eder <lukas.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering, is JDBC driver support for the combination of UDT's
> and arrays planned for the near future? I couldn't find any
> documentation on the JDBC drivers website.
After the rather confusing input about a third-party JDBC driver, I
can confirm that access to UDT arrays is possible via the standard
JDBC driver, if done like this:
// This returns a serialised array. Not very convenient
ResultSet rs =...
String serialised = rs.getObject(index);
Or like this
// This allows for iterating over array elements
// and assembling it manually. I'll use this method
// in jOOQ
ResultSet rs =...
ResultSet iterator = rs.getArray(index).getResultSet();
But not like this
// This would be most convenient
ResultSet rs =...
Object[] array = rs.getArray(index).getArray();
> Is there any specific reason (apart from the fact that UDT's and/or
> ARRAYs are not used often) for this lack of implementation? Clearly,
> the database itself supports this combination. I can easily insert and
> select data from a table holding UDT arrays
The question was answered in another thread. I can live with the above
workaround...
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: