Re: Shared_buffers hint
От | Rafael Domiciano |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shared_buffers hint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3a0028490810080640r6f9eda87o7991434ab5116b78@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Shared_buffers hint ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Ok,
I'm trying this...
Thnks a lot!
2008/10/6 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Rafael Domiciano<rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote:> I'm using 8.3.3 version in this machine..!100M is probably adequate. 2G is a pretty small database server
> So, the shared_buffers set to 100Mb is ok? Or 500Mb is better?
> This server we call "Reporter Server", so it's used to do heavy reports for
> a few users only (I could say 5 users).
> What could be the best config for my server with:
> 2 Gb RAM
> 300 GB HD
> Postgres 8.3
> Dual Core
memory wise. I assume by 300G HD you mean a single hard drive. Since
a single hard drive is going to limit the speed at which you can
access data from it, I'd leave shared_buffers at 100M and let the OS
cache data for you. Also, look at work_mem. You might want to set
those few heavy users to have more work_mem than the other users.
alter user heavyuser set work_mem=128000;
note that work_mem is per user sort, so it's quite possible to exhaust
main memory if you set it high for everybody and they all do sorts on
large sets suddenly.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: